ABSTRACT
Densely occupied spaces (e.g., classrooms) are generally over-crowded and pose a high risk of cross-infection during the pandemic of COVID-19. Among various ventilation systems, impinging jet ventilation (IJV) system might be promising for such spaces. However, the exhaust location of the IJV system used for densely occupied classrooms is unclear. This study aims to investigate the effects of exhaust location on the removal of exhaled contaminants in a classroom (15 × 7 × 5 m3) occupied by 50 students. Exhaled contaminants are modeled by a tracer gas released at the top of each manikin. The reference case has three exhausts evenly distributed in the ceiling. The results indicate that: a) a recirculation airflow entraining exhaled contaminants exists above the occupied zone;b) this recirculation air flow entrains contaminants and accumulates them at the upper part of the room near the diffuser;c) locating merely one exhaust on the same side of the supply diffuser leads to the best indoor air quality, i.e., it reduces the mean age of air from 278 s to 243 s, the mass fraction of CO2 from 753 ppm to 726 ppm, and the concentration of tracer gas from 305 ppm to 266 ppm;d) this layout still performs the best when the supply velocity drops to 0.5 m/s. It is worth noting that the proposed layout has fewer exhausts than the reference case but performs better. These results conclude that the exhaust for large spaces is not evenly distributed but depends on the indoor airflow pattern: the key is locating the exhaust near the region with high contaminant concentration. Factors determining the recirculation airflow are suggested to be further studied. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
Ventilation in confined spaces is essential to reduce the airborne transmission of viruses responsible for respiratory diseases such as COVID-19. Mechanical ventilation using purifiers is an interesting solution for elevator cabins to reduce the risk of infection and improve the air quality. In this work, the optimal position and blowing direction of these devices to maximize ventilation and minimize the residence time of the air inside two cabins (large and small) is studied. Special attention is devoted to idle periods when the cabin is not used by the passengers, in order to keep the cabin ambient safe and clean, avoiding that the trapped air in the cabin (after its use) could suppose a reservoir for contaminants. CFD numerical models of two typical cabin geometries, including the discretization of small slots and grilles for infiltration, have been developed. A full 3D URANS approach with a k-epsilon RNG turbulence model and a non-reactive scalar to compute the mean age of air (MAA) was employed. The CFD results have been also validated with experimental measurements from a home-made 1:4 small-scale mock-up. The optimal position of the purifier is on the larger sidewall of the cabins for a downward blowing direction (case 1 of the database). Flow rates in the range of 0.4–0.6 m3/min, depending on the size of the cabin, are sufficient to assure a correct ventilation. Upward blowing may be preferable only if interaction of the jet core with the ceiling or other flow deflecting elements are found. In general, the contribution of infiltrations (reaching values of up to 10%), and how these secondary flows interact with the main flow pattern driven by the purifier, is relevant and not considered previously in the literature. Though an optimal position can improve ventilation considerably, it has been proven that a good choice of the purification flow rate is more critical to ensure an adequate air renewal. © 2022 The Authors
ABSTRACT
Ventilation in confined spaces is essential to reduce the airborne transmission of viruses responsible for respiratory diseases such as COVID-19. Mechanical ventilation using purifiers is an interesting solution for elevator cabins to reduce the risk of infection and improve the air quality. In this work, the optimal position and blowing direction of these devices to maximize ventilation and minimize the residence time of the air inside two cabins (large and small) is studied. Special attention is devoted to idle periods when the cabin is not used by the passengers, in order to keep the cabin ambient safe and clean, avoiding that the trapped air in the cabin (after its use) could suppose a reservoir for contaminants. CFD numerical models of two typical cabin geometries, including the discretization of small slots and grilles for infiltration, have been developed. A full 3D URANS approach with a k-epsilon RNG turbulence model and a non-reactive scalar to compute the mean age of air (MAA) was employed. The CFD results have been also validated with experimental measurements from a home-made 1:4 small-scale mock-up. The optimal position of the purifier is on the larger sidewall of the cabins for a downward blowing direction (case 1 of the database). Flow rates in the range of 0.4–0.6 m3/min, depending on the size of the cabin, are sufficient to assure a correct ventilation. Upward blowing may be preferable only if interaction of the jet core with the ceiling or other flow deflecting elements are found. In general, the contribution of infiltrations (reaching values of up to 10%), and how these secondary flows interact with the main flow pattern driven by the purifier, is relevant and not considered previously in the literature. Though an optimal position can improve ventilation considerably, it has been proven that a good choice of the purification flow rate is more critical to ensure an adequate air renewal.